y

p

p

,

es were highly overlapped. This is why the DOG p value was

herefore it may not be reasonable to treat this gene as a DEG.

e 6.26 shows the expression distribution of the gene 201600_at in

t cancer data set. The ORT p value was less than 0.01, but the

alue was greater than 0.01. The COPA, OS and MOST models

icted it as a DEG, but the t test and LSOSS models did not. After

g four cancer outliers and one normal outlier (all were the high

outliers), the gene became indifferentiable. This is why the DOG

was 0.86. Two boxes in the boxplot shows that two distributions

hly overlapped.

The expression distribution of the gene 201600_at in the breast cancer data. The

des refer to Figure 6.24.

e 6.27 shows the expression distribution of the gene 203968_at in

t cancer data set. The MOST p value was less than 0.01, but the

alue was 0.58, i.e., greater than 0.01. The gene was also identified

DEG by the t test, COPA, OS, ORT and LSOSS models. The

plot shows that two distributions of expressions are overlapped.